Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Republican States Test Drive New Orwellian GPS Tracking Device in Humans

Raleigh, NC — A Lee County man will be monitored by a Global Positioning System for the rest of his life. Murnice Chandler was convicted on 21 counts of indecent liberties with a child and was sentenced Monday to 10 years in prison. This may be a victory for the child or a victory for a Republican police state. Despite the fact that we are now using the term "liberties" to describe a crime for which a lifetime of monitoring is mandatory and a redneck state bureaucrat's idea of "indecent" goes conveniently unquestioned, there are much broader Orwellian overtones to this ruling.

Instead of educating and empowering children about sexuality in a timely manner in the home which will empower them for life, the Republican GOP is more excited about outlawing such education, labeling countless fathers as "predators" and implanting Orwellian tracking and control devices used exclusively by police states. The devices were developed by the CIA's top secret Monarch Mind Control project. This is technology taken from the vast military establishment that President Eisenhower warned us about. Such devices are ideal for political control and profit. They don't want you to know that many of these cases are bogus smear campaigns employed to manipulate child custody. That's why so many of them are reversed by higher courts. But higher courts are being stacked in favor of the military establishment.

Of the many "wars" waged by Republicans against their enemies, children are by far the greatest victims. Between 1991 and 1999, the number of children with a parent incarcerated in a federal or state correctional facility increased by more than 100%. Many of these children are false orphans created by and for a new child trafficking industry which feeds Big-Pharma companies with head cases and the Pentagon with fresh recruits. Republicans need hysteria for power. They actually create some of these criminals in order to sustain the hysteria.

The drive to replace complex parental responsibilities like effective sex education with simplistic "abstinence only" "zero tolerance" programs is overwhelming. The drive is for profit and political power. But what is unknown to many Americans, this political emotional manipulation can be programmed on a massive scale using Freudian sex taboos programmed into children and bureaucrats. Such Black Widow programming is now everywhere in America and it comes directly from Nazi Mind Control programming.

A new Republican law passed last year created the GPS program to track sex offenders, like Chandler. As usual, this law has been promoted by the Orwellian appeal for public safety. With old house arrest bracelets, officers could only tell if an offender left the home. With GPS, they know exactly where the person is at all times. If the program works for those smeared with sex crimes largely dependant upon a political definition of "decency," it could easily evolve and be incrementally implemented for the rest of us. After all, "decency" is easily taken out of context for highly charged child custody disputes or political reasons. What is "indecent" to Americans has been proven by numerous anthropology studies to empower and save the lives of many children in other cultures simply by telling them the truth about sexuality. "Sex monsters" are often institutionalized persons taken from their parents and raised in an atmosphere of banality and imposed ignorance all of which has been pre-approved as "decent," largely directed by politicians. Children instinctively know that bureaucrats or profiteers do not really care for them like a parent. This is precisely why parental rights were taken for granted by our Founding Fathers and not so by today's politicians.

No one seems to have suggested the fact that the "monitoring" of the mentally disturbed will be the least of our problems after we collectively torture them with Orwellian devices and manipulate their children as de facto slaves. Does anyone ask the obvious question: Does such torture and imposed ignorance actually make these people dangerous in the first place? Were these men actually educated by compassionate parents or by a cold and ruthless state? Institutional abuse by a police state is the most under-reported crime in America, directly and undeniably linked to most other crimes and avoiding these political abuses was the single highest priority of our Constitution.

Superior Court Judge Allen Baddour ordered Chandler to be tracked by GPS. The judge would not comment on the case, but said the law makes the punishment automatic for certain sex offenders. Despite the "get tough" benefits to Republican politicians concerning such cases, are other "non-Republicans" far behind?

"That person is determined to be a recidivist, a sexually violent predator or to have committed an aggravated offense. Those are the three main categories," Baddour said. But next year, one of these categories may be eliminated, incrementally. Today, all personal hygiene activities involving your children can easily be elevated to "aggravated offenses." The option to do so is purely political and these decisions are made by politicians, not ordinary citizens.

Hannah Rowland, an Administrator for the GPS program at the North Carolina Department of Corrections, said there are 124 offenders wearing the GPS device around the state. Among those, 40 will be wearing the device for life, she said.

The device "allows us to know their whereabouts if needed," Rowland said.

Authoritarian Republicans will also be viewed as necessary for maintaining such Orwellian systems for "public safety." In reality, the public will be much less safe, as a new sub-class of "offenders" are generated, living under bridges and near schools, by the institutional abuse which convinces hundreds of thousands of them that they are incurable "predators." This is the "Frankenstein effect" which has been highly documented as a true source of criminality resulting from completely avoidable institutional abuse. You will never hear a "get tough" Republican politician addressing this real source of violent crime in about 50% of U.S. violent crime cases.

Equipment carried at the ankle and waist communicates with satellites to give an offender's position. Probation officers receive updates on computer through cell phone signals. They get alerts when an offender goes where he or she is not supposed to go.

The system costs about $8.30 a day for each offender (so it becomes some Republican's profit center). It only takes a couple officers to track the GPS wearers across the state.

The GPS system does have trouble updating when offenders live in bad cell phone signal areas. In those cases, the equipment sends a report once a day when it is plugged in to charge its batteries.

So the migration of sex offenders to rural, out of the way places might be the next "win-win" boom for a new Republican Big-Brother growth industry. After all, there are record numbers of sex offenders being made by such institutional abuse and imposed ignorance. A new industry is emerging, spawned by fear and ignorance. The only losers will be our children who may never know freedom, justice or true protection from idiot bureaucrats.

Many "liberal" states have already banned such mind control programs.

Dr. Louis Jolyon West, chairman of the department of psychiatry at the University of California at Los Angeles and director of its Neuropsychiatric Institute. In the early 1960s, when he had been at the University of Oklahoma, Dr. West had run an LSD research program financed by the CIA. He had proposed to the governor the creation of a financially well-endowed multidisciplinary Center for the Study and Reduction of Violence. Within its confines, doctors would explore all types of violent behavior, what caused it, and how it could be detected, prevented, and treated. It was planned to site the Center on a converted missile site in the Santa Monica Mountains. The psychiatrist proposed that the Center deal with persons who displayed antisocial and impulsive aggression. Its laboratories would be devoted to genetic, biochemical, and neurophysiological studies of "violent individuals, including prisoners and hyperkinetic children."

Another California project cancelled due to public protest was a proposal to implant brain electrodes in prisoners at Vacaville State Prison, site of CIA mind control experiments on the drug pemoline under MKSEARCH. The prisoners were to be monitored by remote tracking technology post-discharge. If they entered a restricted area or exhibited sexual arousal patterns on remote EEG telemetry, a signal would be sent to their brain electrodes immobilizing them, and law enforcement personnel would be dispatched to apprehend them.

Dr. Louis Jolyon West was cleared at TOP SECRET for his work on MKULTRA. His numerous connections to the mind control network illustrate how the network was maintained; not through any central conspiracy, but by an interlocking network of academic relationships, grants, conferences, and military appointments. Some doctors in the network were not funded directly by the CIA or military, but their work was of direct relevance to mind control, non-lethal weapons development, creation of controlled dissociation and the building of Manchurian Candidates.

'Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.’
- U.S. government mind manipulator, Dr. Jose Delgado, Congressional Record, No. 262E, Vol. 118, 1974.

Few Americans understand the real science of psychology which is a deliberately imposed ignorance. The CIA has actively advanced enormous "truth" spending to shape this "science" in major U.S. programming centers, or the Psychological Industrial Complex. The established science indicates that the subconscious mind is primary, not the conscious mind. The subconscious mind can be programmed on a massive scale, using powerful Alpha-level programming. This subconscious mind is not rational, but is emotional. Therefore, the power of subconscious programming for political manipulation which builds an actual slavery matrix over the American people cannot be over-emphasized. It literally builds the emotional contagion which fully serves secret, unconstitutional government agendas advancing false wars and a totalitarian delusion of "parental government." Therefore, downplaying the importance of subconscious Mind Control for massive, wrongful goverment manipulation is about as criminally negligent as any imposed delusion in world history.

View the YouTube Video on the First Human Cyborg

LINTHICUM, Maryland (AP) -- Advancing our federal government into the subconscious mind, the Pentagon is developing new brain-electro technologies. Military binoculars may soon get information directly from the brains of the soldiers using them.

"Smart" binoculars could tap into the brain's ability to spot patterns and movement.

With the idea that that the brain absorbs and assesses more visual information than it lets on -- and that it could make more sense out of what's visible through high-power binoculars if it stopped filtering that information -- the Pentagon has awarded contracts to two defense firms to develop brainwave-aided binoculars.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, is betting that intelligent binoculars can tap into the brain's ability to spot patterns and movement and help soldiers detect threats from miles farther away than they can with traditional binoculars.

Electrodes on the scalp inside a helmet will record the user's brain activity as it processes information about high-resolution images produced by wide-angle military binoculars. Those responses will train the binoculars over time to recognize threats.

"You need to present the soldier with many images and then use the person's brain to figure out what is of interest," said Yuval Boger, CEO of Sensics, Inc., a Baltimore-based maker of panoramic head-mounted displays.

Sensics belongs to a team led by Northrop Grumman that won $6.7 million for its research. Other members include Northrop's Linthicum-based Electronic Systems division; SAIC of San Diego, California; Theia Technologies LLC, of Wilsonville, Oregon; and Dallas-based L-3 Communications Infrared Products.

Researchers from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgetown University, Portland State University and the University of Colorado at Boulder are also participating.

Company tests eye-controlled 'wearable' gadgets
Paul Hasler, an associate professor of engineering at Georgia Tech, described the technology as an example of "neuromorphic" engineering that uses hardware and software to emulate human intelligence.

"You would see a certain picture in your field of view, but the device would actually be looking over a much wider space -- and if it found something interesting it would present you with that picture as well," Hasler said.

The other contractor to win a contract is HRL Laboratories, which received $4.3 million, said DARPA spokeswoman Jan Walker.

Dr. Robert Shin, assistant professor of neurology and ophthalmology at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, said the brain is constantly processing images but most get filtered out.

"There is a level where the brain can identify things before it ever makes it to the conscious level," Shin said. "Your brain says, 'It may be something.' But it might not realize that it is something that should rise to the conscious level." By acknowledging a federal regard for the subconscious mind, isn't the Pentagon acknowledging far more than just technology? They are acknowledging that they can and are manipulating the subconscious mind, a domain they now fully embrace as their constitutional domain.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

We Were Warned of the Attacks on our Children, Religious Sex Cults and Illegal Inquisitions. Is the Supreme Court really Irrelevant?

We were warned by our Founding Fathers that a two party system of government led by the elite would lead to the demise of our Constitution and our basic freedoms. If children are raised in an environment of fear, deception and imposed ignorance, they will become morally weak, hopelessly dependent, cowardly and vulnerable. Our children can later be manipulated as an ignorant mob, as if in a political fog, because we do not have the courage to raise them in truth. Does such a political fog sound familiar? We have been living with "clean" population control programs for two generations now. These programs require a secretive police state enforcing learned ignorance into our children. They require Femi-Nazi hate groups who presume a superiority over parents and the Constitution. But Femi-Nazis have a lesson to learn: Freedom is the biggest bitch on the block. Our Constitution made it so. Deceiving children about sexuality is akin to indoctrinating them into deception and robbing them of their future. This won't fly with good parents!

What was my crime? I believe the 911 attacks were a massive fraud, military Psy-Ops event for which my children needed protection. The best minds at Harvard trained me about these Psy-Ops methods and how to protect my children from them. They require comprehensive sex education. Why? Imposed sexual ignorance is the first requirement for mass Alpha-level brainwashing and everyone working these programs knows it. That's why they protect their own children in the same manner. In Bedford County, Pennsylvania, this imposed sexual ignorance is now universally imposed with draconian force so that children will acquire "controlling sexual taboos" and wrongful top-down authority programming. This process actually makes pedophiles, drug-addicted "conformists" and much more. This may sound like Nazi law for a very good reason, these Mind Control methods came directly from Nazi Germany. Good science will tell us that people like Freud have cured this barbaric mind control abuse by employing the parental duty of sex education with children in a timely manner. But we now find the "threat" of parental "sex predators" is found everywhere "good Republicans" can lynch liberals as actual Psy-Ops operations have fully conditioned Americans to retard their children's own intellectual and emotional development through fear, ignorance and disinformation. We know that such ignorance attacks the subconscious mind creating enormous personal and social ills. Yet the Republican-dominated military machine now functions everywhere from a top-down Psy-Ops fraud which sets up children for cyborg indoctrination and fully represents this imposed ignorance as "innocence" as it will utterly destroy these children for benefit of a very small elite.

What is truly disturbing is that many Republicans want you to believe that sexual repression is necessary to repress sexuality. The truth is, sexual repression has always been about repressing communication about sexuality, setting children up for powerful Mind Control manipulation, sexual myths, sexual bigotries "which just so happen" to serve Republican politics. This process requires a certain sophistication to understand, that it why good science is deliberately attacked, dumbing-down our children from generation to generation. That not only makes this a privacy matter for parents, it's a First Amendment issue. We are not talking about porn shops in Times Square, we are talking about basic life rights of children to learn about their bodies in a safe and effective environment, free from political intrusion.

In fact, most of modern psychology is based upon the premise that early childhood education in these matters helps determine your personality throughout your life. Whether your child becomes an "elite" child or a "non-elite" child will center on this one issue. How do the elite raise their children? If you cannot imagine talking openly with your parents about sex, you may have been raised sexually repressed. This repression may have been enforced by corrupt government officials working a political indoctrination agenda and they don't even know it. Why? Such methods are now easily administered by Marionette Mind Control programming of these bureaucrats and this is a basic Pentagon method, not a Constitutional directive. Children deliberately held in ignorance in critical stages of their development have certain learning disorders in common. One of these disorders is being easily manipulated by authority figures, even that we should blindly trust our federal government in matters as important as war. The matters concerning their bodies which are held as taboo often come back later in their lives as very serious problems. Freud exposed this fact 100 years ago and was then "acquired" by Tavistock, a secret "crowd control" "secret service" organization.

These children are much more likely to never develop the objectivity to make wise decisions about sex and communicate effectively. They may become compulsive in many things and even disturbed. They certainly learn early not to talk about sexuality. Have we deliberately made them sexual idiots? Sexual repression is about communications, or more accurately, the censorship of such communication. This repression finds its true roots in the slave-making arts. That is why condoms are not necessarily revolting to the sexually repressed, but instruction on how to use them is. Why is AIDS killing tens of millions of children and parents around the globe only to have Republicans refuse to distribute condoms for "moral" reasons? This sexual repression serves elitist eugenics!

Tavistock has monopolized the facts about sexual repression to be used by government for active eugenics programs.

What's worse, children held in ignorance are much more likely to become disturbed by such imposed confusion and their sexually repressed parents will go along with this Nazi eugenics scam. But active secret government programs target politically undesirable parents who actually educate their children and protect them from unnecessary ignorance and hysteria. In fact, those children who can communicate effectively about sexual matters are now routinely turned against their own parents who have empowered them.

The government actively generates hysteria in small children and families. This hysteria becomes a reason to drug them. After a short period of time necessary to condition a complacent society and freed to enjoy absolute powers, these government agents actually run sex cults and drug farms for profit. Nothing is more Orwellian than the truth.

Does this sound like a primitive political program found in deepest Africa for which enlightened Americans are fighting to bring modern "sex education?" These abuses to basic parental rights are routine in America through secretive, underground police state practices. They are heinous crimes against humanity ongoing in the U.S. falsely "justified" by our many politically inspired laws.

View the YouTube video: FaceBook CIA Mining information on Children

The central distinction between the Founding Fathers and our current crop of politicians is that the former had the wisdom to endorse a "rights centered" government and not a "law centered" one. Laws are too easily employed to create false and corrupting power systems, confusing everyone. "Do unto your neighbor" is not a law, it's a right of decency that a child can learn. The distinction between the two is one of civility and a fundamental negation of politics.

A long tradition of superstition and myth was designed to repress sexual objectivity and replace it with highly subjective controlling mechanisms like shame, largely based on imposed ignorance. Now this tradition is used by your government to control its own population for political reasons. Objective education of your children can easily be transformed into subjective smear campaigns used against good parents for child custody manipulations or for purely political reasons. In fact, these political agents are told that they are "required" to "err on the side of child abuse" or assume that objective sex education with children is really subjective child abuse. That it why it is critically important to fight for parental authority and parental rights right here in the U.S.. Isn't the corruption of these rights the source of the ultimate arrogance found in government "social" programs that exploit fear, ignorance and vagueness in children? Keeping children "innocent" actually keeps them ignorant, banal and intellectually repressed. This repression becomes the source of negative conditioning which actually disturbs many children. Don't these programs actually promote these things to sustain a false politics which "shape" many families by destroying them? "What is collectively believed to be true by children, will later become the law for adults." Parental authority is supplanted by the state. Even ignorance, fear and bigotries can be sustained from one generation to the next simply by keeping children stupid and intellectually repressed about basic human sexuality. Such methods serve an authoritarian Republican political machine and this is extremely dangerous for democracy.

This is precisely how corrupt government circumvents its own laws. It must first dumb-down its children to accept the banality of servitude, usury, debt and political deception which only serves a small political elite. Children today are not allowed to hug in the schoolyard. Not because it is harmful to them, it clearly is not. It is harmful to those who want to control, recruit and deceive them. Their parents have been conditioned to accept these inhuman controlling methods as "necessary" for some broader social good. Because the parents themselves have "learned" as children not to communicate about certain "private things," they do not ask the most obvious questions. They have been duped because they literally have no one to turn to for information. Sexual repression is not designed to sustain a morality, its only function is to control communications and sustain the political elite in a false and undemocratic power system and repress all others. Group castration by the state of countless fathers, therefore, can be viewed as "humane" by such idiots. Such methods of imposed ignorance have been used for centuries to condition "peasants."

To view the power structure of any society, look first at how children are educated about sex. Are children raised to be masters of their bodies and minds or are they repressed by government? A culture of Myth or a culture of Reason begins in pre-school.

As a parent, you must be an authority figure who must be consistent in applying this authority. If you indoctrinate a child into shame or ignorance and then later punish that child for being ignorant, is this healthy and wise? After all, double standards and inconsistencies are fundamentally unfair. When those "authorities" in society choose to ignore the law and get away with it, we call them "elites." If the elites begin to build their own secret government by deception, I call them traitors. This deception can be programmed into children and called "innocence." When lower courts routinely ignore the rulings of the Supreme Court for most people but not for the elite, we have a genuine Constitutional crisis where the word of law is not consistently applied and becomes corrupted. Even children know that these inconsistencies are fundamentally unfair.

Secret and unconstitutional programs are out of control, enforced by a police state. Who will be a patriot and stop them?

View the YouTube video: The Real Intent of our Secret Government

Now a secret and illegal government is empowered by a culture of corruption which has been allowed to erode your most basic civil rights. All they need are vague innuendo and learned ignorance for which they indoctrinate into your children. Now inconsistencies between the elite and the masses are routine and widening, between lower courts and the Supreme Court. This culture of division, shame and ignorance is directly and indirectly indoctrinated into your children through a corrupt government when they first enter schools. Your children are justifiably confused, perplexed and abused by design. A sexually repressed culture is falsely applied to your children and is manifested through a multitude of bizarre, inconsistent and harmful attitudes which politics can only make worse. These attitudes can presume that men are predators. Age-old and proven sex education used by our Founding Fathers is "abusive." Only a parent can effectively make the politically irrational rational for a child. Only a parent can protect his child from the imposed banality and corruption of imposed ignorance. Bureaucrats are targeting your children for political indoctrination, manipulation and social engineering that functions completely outside of the Constitution. Their methods are those of sex cults, the military establishment and corrupt political agents who do not enforce the Constitution. They certainly do not have the same motives as parents. They want you to believe that long-standing Supreme Court decisions which ensure your basic rights as a parent are irrelevant.

Bureaucrats presume a superiority over parents and sound the clearest death knell for civilization. They maintain secret government programs designed to dumb-down your children, teach them distrust in parents, fear, confusion, teach them shame, so they will never know their basic rights. (And conveniently have fewer children themselves as they acquire dysfunction skills.) Trust only the State even as the State routinely violates the Constitution and your rights. Trust 9-to-5 bureaucrats and their prescription of banality and intellectual limitation. They effectively manipulate their political subjects starting in pre-school with "promulgated threats" making them fear "those who would destroy our way of life" and violate our laws.

But who is really destroying our way of life, gradually, incrementally, through our own government agencies? Who is really violating our most fundamental laws? Look only to minority families, or what is left of them. Talibanic sexual repression is nothing new: "To destroy any enemy, destroy the authority of his parent." Entire mega-cities are plagued with fatherless children and, more accurately, children made fatherless by the state. Did the Taliban take away your most basic parental rights to educate your child in your own home? Do terrorists take away your most fundamental due process rights or place false courts on top of Supreme Courts? The most fundamental of rights taken for granted by our Founding Fathers was all documented in black and white. They gave us a ball to keep our eyes on. American Femi-Nazis ignore our Constitution every day under the guise of "protection" which has been warped away from reason for political efficiency. Now even good parents are depicted as a threat because you have enabled these criminals to take over your government and take our eyes off the ball.

If our children are meant to be raised by bureaucrats, why not draft them at birth? Through illegal, underground courts and police state abuses of power, many bureaucrats are doing precisely that. The total dysfunction of the American family is clearly drawn through political lines. A disproportionate amount of minority children are ending up on the front lines of our many Republican wars by design. Population control through attitude propaganda has certainly worked. It is a "clean" method which is completely unconstitutional. It has worked for a political elite who hold no resemblance to our Founding Fathers, except for those who raised slaves as they simultaneously advocated "freedom." Any population control program should start with them. Have them learnwhat slavery means, have them learn what torture means. Believe me, they will come out of the political fog and see the light.

These conspirators are not only fraudulent, they directly defy their most sacred oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. They are certainly not public servants "saving" children. By repressing the emotional and intellectual development of children through sexual repression and the false indoctrination of fear and shame, our government is actually creating the idiots of fear and ignorance who are easily manipulated by secret and illegal agendas. These children will grow up to accept a confused and illegal authority system. This confusion has severe consequences for them. If you believe your government would never do such a thing and operates in an honest, Constitutional manner without illegal, secret agendas, you must view: From Freedom to Fascism

Maybe it is time to understand what the Constitution really means? This blog is dedicated to exposing the underground, elitist government which plans to have full reign over your children's minds, souls and bodies. They want to impose this new world order under the threat of terrorism. With the introduction of AIDS into the world, imposed sexual ignorance is the most effective means for the elite to target and destroy their political enemies. If you deny this, look to our own foreign policy. Condoms and effective sex education is the single most critical need in all Africa, but is actively opposed by this government for Orwellian "moral" reasons. Imposed sexual ignorance in children is the leading method of political control and population control used throughout history. The most horrendous deaths imaginable were imposed on these people by "decent" Americans who have spent more money on one bomb than on all condoms in Africa. Sexual ignorance imposed on the "peasant" have kept the elite in power for centuries. The peasant was the eunich in the corner waiting to serve his master. That is why parental sex education in the home must be protected in a true democracy. Otherwise, your child will become that eunich, trusting these idiots.

The obvious best method to defeat terrorism, illness and ignorance is to go back to our Constitution and bring back our fundamental rights. For the political agents destroying families in your community with a crusade mentality don't even know these rights. Are they really any better than the Taliban? These rights already exist but are routinely violated by state officials held in ignorance themselves. You have a fundamental right to raise, educate and secure your children in privacy, due process and justice. The nanny-state programs used in the U.S. today do precisely the opposite.

Under the rouse of terrorism and "national security," you are meant to be complacent and "patriotic" as your most fundamental rights are taken away. This political scam is working. But it works only for the elite.

If these nanny-state programs which effectively destroy minority families were turned on the political elite, who now live in the comfortable position to deny that these programs even exist, these programs would not last one day under our Constitution.

How to Program Confusion into Children from

"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government." - Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderberg meeting at Evian, France, May 21, 1992. Transcribed from a tape recording made by one of the Swiss delegates.

The Burning of Rome

Nero burned Rome so that he could blame the Christians and get rid of them.

In January 1993 a document from Dick Cheney called "Defense Strategy for the 1990s" called for the United States to assert its military superiority to prevent the emergence of a new superpower rival. It was based on a 1992 classified internal policy statement titled "Defense Planning Guidance".

These ideas were resurrected in a new report by another Cheney-Rumsfeld organization, the (PNAC) Project for the New American Century in 2000. Entitled, "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources" it concludes the following:

The United States needed a catastrophe, "a new Pearl Harbor" to jump start the blueprint for military and economic world dominance.

The Burning of the Reichstag

The Reichstag building burned on February 27, 1933. Marinus Van der Lubbe was caught and tortured by the Gestapo. He confessed to the crime but denied that he was part of a communist plot. Hitler used this as an excuse to get rid of the communist party.

Operation Northwoods

Just in case you think we are incapable of such behavior.
Operation Northwoods was a 1962 Pentagon proposal to stage phony terror attacks on US citizens to provide a pretext to invade Cuba. The only reason we now know about this program is that activists through the Freedom of Information Act allowed us a "right" to learn about what our own government was doing decades ago.

September 11.

On September 11, 2001 four passenger planes were hijacked and flown into American buildings. Three reached their target. Six weeks later the U.S.A. Patriot act and military tribunals were rushed into laws, changing the face of the American justice system forever. The government experts claimed that they never knew that this was possible. Hogwash! Even I could see what was coming after the bombing of the navy ship the USS Cole in October 2000.

A simple systems analysis drill would have demonstrated the possibility. By taking the three basic environments of air, land and sea one could have seen the escalating pattern of suicide bombings was based on using the transportation systems from each environment as a weapon against important targets. Truck bombings, bombings of navy ships and government buildings close to airports. All spelled disaster.
Not being evil, even my mind would not conceive of passenger planes. I thought it could have been less risky to hijack package delivery planes.

But Was It Allowed?

The Cosmic War

Rather than viewing this as a great conspiracy, I see this as the clouding of human minds so that the cosmic war can progress by leaps and bounds.
Through one event, and a subsequent war that somehow went terribly wrong, the whole world is caught in a trap. The events are so bizarre that no group can fix it. We are all being propelled forward into one set of idiotic actions for another. We cannot get out and we cannot get off. We are plagued with failure after failure and criminal activity.

In this atmosphere of fear we traded freedoms and engaged in brutality. We believe with all our hearts that we are protecting ourselves from terrorism. And, that this single situation justifies our actions. But, in one day, a cosmic terror will grip us and we will use these new laws and this new attitude to execute the kind of brutality that we still believe that we are incapable of doing.

Every action and setback keeps fulfilling prophecy or sets up the situation to rapidly fulfill a future prophecy. I have never seen anything like it.

The reason why some people say that this event was allowed and others say it was planned by the United States is because four aircraft went missing and were joy riding for two hours and no military aircraft was launched to intercept. The F-16s are supposed to be deployed if planes are missing over three minutes. Well, one missing plane and no deployment of an F-16 could be attributed to lazy employees. Four missing passenger airlines and no response gives teeth to the rumors.

So it could have been allowed to grab powers and legally create a scenario that could remove civil rights. But it would have taken a massive conspiracy to do so. This type of conspiracy usually fails. So, looking at their performance in other matters I would say that they are plagued by persistent incompetence.

Case: The Burning of the Reichstag.

The Reichstag building burned on February 27, 1933. On February 28, 1933 the "Protective Custody" law was created. It gave authorities the right to arrest on suspicion of "criminal activity" and to incarcerate indefinitely without the benefit of a lawyer or a trial. Today, we are seeing the hyper-abuse claims against children being promoted as a reason to traffic them, separate their families, without any cause. Simple accusation and allegations are all that is necessary alleged by anyone anonymously, except for the elite. The children of the elite are protected by customary courts requiring actual evidence and due process. The children of the non-elite are directed to secret "hearings" or "investigations" by bureaucrats. But who decides which direction a child might go? An agent of a political police state, not a jury of citizens, even when such juries are required by multiple laws.

Marinus Van der Lubbe was caught and tortured by the Gestapo. He confessed to the crime but denied that he was part of a communist plot.

Without any other evidence, Hitler used this as an excuse to arrest the leaders of the German Communist party. He even wanted them killed that night. He also used this as an excuse to assume powers as a dictator.

Van der Lubbe was convicted and executed on January 10, 1934. All the others arrested were acquitted. There was no evidence. So, outraged at the results of the trial (he did not get the verdict that he wanted), Hitler decided that any future treason cases would be taken from the Supreme Court and given to a newly created People's court so that they could guarantee the "right" verdict. We have Gitmo for "efficiency" reasons. Perfectly conditioned Americans are baffled by what "torture" means. Parents are routinely threatened by the police-state kidnapping of their children because of mere allegations through "civil" courts.

The Laws of the Nazi Empire.

The first law of the Nazi Empire: Bureaucrats over parents. If a populace can be conditioned by a cult of authority or nationalism to presume that bureaucrats are superior to parents, the populace can be easily subjugated by the state. Under authoritarian socialism, no human right can be preserved. Even the bonds between parent and child can be easily broken by bureaucrats acting through kangaroo-court inquisitions.

In addition, they ended several civil liberties under the claim that they were "protecting" the people. These were incrementally applied starting with children and the weak.

The Dictator. January 30, 1933. Hitler was elected as chancellor of Germany.
The Federal court system was stacked in favor of conservatism. Judges who excersized their own free minds were branded as "activists."

No Right to Assemble or Express Opinions. February 4, 1933. Hitler convinced the president to sign a law that authorized the police to prohibit public meetings and publications that "endangered public security".

Telecommunications laws gave the media companies to five conservative owners.

February 27, 1933. Reichstag burned. Communists became the enemies.

The September 11, 2001 attacks. Al-Qaeda became the enemy that required these laws. Liberal voices for reason and due process widely condemned as "unpatriotic." Conservative media outlets actively promote war, never question "guilt by association" charges against Iraq.

Protective Custody. February 28, 1933 Decree. It suspended civil liberties. A false emergency was created after the parliament building burned. People now believe that Hitler planned it. The death camps began.

The law authorized the police to make arrests on suspicion of "criminal activity" and incarcerated without benefit of legal counsel or trial. Bureaucrats were awarded the absolute power to act on "gut" feelings about anyone.

The Patriot Act took away liberties, set up military tribunals and allowed indefinite detention. The spirit of elitist authority transcends our traditional legal system throughout our society. Our schools actively indoctrinate our children with these authoritarian concepts of "patriotism."

Enabling Act. March 23, 1933. It gave Hitler absolute power to make laws for four years. These laws would be above the constitution.

The world is rapidly evolving towards a one world legal system which is modeled after the Inquisition. Many people are not concerned about their eroding civil rights, because of fear of terrorism. And because they falsely assume that these laws do not coddle real criminals and that they will guarantee us peace, justice and safety. With this thinking we captured farmers, cab drivers and barbers and began torturing them in Iraq, even though Iraq never attacked the United States, nor were they involved with Al-Qaeda.

Inquisition laws do not discriminate between the evidence and the innocent or the guilty. All are guilty. Evidence can be achieved by torture or intimidation. Evidence no longer leads to an arrest. We will arrest first then find the evidence.

The collapse of a free society is integral to the plans of a secret elitist government. Think I am wrong?

The crusades were ordered because the "unity of Europe" was threatened. The religious unity. The Spanish Inquisition was called to unite Spain under the Catholic church.

The Roman Inquisition was called to suppress the Protestant heresy. The church is promoting the belief that heresy is the cause of social revolution. Such a revolution jeopardizes the plans of the political globalists.

So a darker force is behind these new laws. It intends to piggy back its goals on top of the political globalists. The emerging global religion and government will use these laws to justify their tyranny. When they have the legal means by which they will persecute, they will soon invent the crimes that will target the victims. Through the concepts of "public unity", "racism" and "hate speech" these groups are suppressing all religious speech that turns the light on their sinister plans. Because, lurking behind the war cry of obliterating "hate speech" is a tyrant hiding its activities and waiting to suppress all free expression and thought by implementing religious laws in the entire world.

Civilized laws have always guaranteed certain legal rights. They were based on the fact that the people would not have justice perverted if they could participate in the judicial process. Also, it protected the lone accused against the vast array of forces on the side of the government. Otherwise, the powerless masses could not hope to defend themselves against a state with unlimited funds, time, expertise and power. As a part of the efforts to ensure a fair hearing, several rights have been recognized.

Innocent until proven guilty. The ones who believe that a crime has been committed should bear the burden of proof based on the evidence that convinced them of your guilt. You have a right to cross-examine the witness, tell the true context to the story and prove a bias or misconception in the witness. None of these rights are necessary in new illegal courts.

Because innocence is assumed, a person should not be held in jail indefinitely until the trial is over. If not, the innocent would routinely be punished. Trials are the method that we have agreed upon to determine guilt, not suspicion and arrest.

This is necessary to preserve the status of innocence until guilt can be proved by the facts of the crime in question. This is important because humans will tend to form an opinion based on these negative actions. And you can never be certain if someone is being convicted for a past crime. The theory is that the evidence of the current crime should stand on its own merit.
Trial by Jury. A group of ordinary citizens who are strangers, who should not have any preconceived conclusions will judge the facts based on the evidence.
Double Jeopardy. You cannot be repeatedly tried for the same crime until a guilty verdict is obtained.

The presence of a lawyer does not change the facts or the evidence in the crime. The lawyers are not the enemy. They are necessary to protect the accused from a vast array of abuses by a prosecution system that assumes guilt.

These rights are under attack globally. The proof is that draconian changes to most of these laws have been secretly in place since 1996 before the terrorist attack. The threat of terrorism has simply been used as an excuse to win public support for them. As Kissenger stated in 1992, fear will make us exchange our rights for safety.
The legal systems have been targeted by a group of people who are determined to create a global government for the sole purpose of global dominance and installing a global religion. The first casualties in this war are the justice system and the media. Because the media does not analyze and report on these issues frequently, the public is not informed about the replacement of their legal system for one that is modeled after the infamous Inquisition.

Habeas Corpus and Indefinite Detention

This is the right that causes those who have someone in custody to produce that prisoner with a statement to justify his detention.

In Britain, a person must be produced and charged within sixty hours of arrest. In America it is twenty four hours. The prosecutor also has the burden of proof. This is important because an innocent person often cannot prove a negative. If the government arrested you for terrorism and required you to prove that you did not meet with Terry Heiss to finalize plans to hijack airplanes, most of you could not do it. Even if the prosecution narrowed the offensive action to a specific date, most of you would still be unable to prove your innocence. Why? Because you do not spend your day establishing an alibi or remembering every detail of your daily actions. So, the law justly requires that prosecutors must have some reasonable proof on which to arrest you and they must provide all the proof to convict you. They must have evidence.

This thinking is apparently inefficient, makes guilty people go free, coddles criminals and handcuffs the police. But if we allowed people in power to arrest citizens because of their expertise and "gut feelings" we will set up an environment of persecution of the masses by a few powerful self-righteous people. This is precisely what's going on.

The trend (even before terrorism) is to suspend Habeas Corpus and arrest someone indefinitely or for long periods while the legal system tries to find evidence against the person. Under reasonable laws, the government had to have a reason and some evidence to support it before an arrest is attempted.
This new trend makes someone subject to the whim of a malicious power and can be used merely to financially ruin someone during the months or years that they are incarcerated. These tactics were used by kings and papists to subdue some groups and is the exact reason why the right has been recognized by civilized governments for centuries.

Trial By Jury

The right to a trial by a jury of your peers is also under attack. Critical thinking is being suspended by labeling ordinary citizens as "simple", stupid and unable to judge the complexity of a case. The right wing has been attacking court systems and promoting replacement systems that rely on special judges to guarantee convictions. New procedures are described as "fairer, simpler and more efficient". Fair to whom? Simpler than what? And more efficient at what? Remember, the Inquisition was fair to the church, simple for the prosecution and more efficient at killing and converting people. The "simple" and "efficient" methods used was to torture people until they said and did what you wanted. People, justice is not simple. To be completely fair it cannot be "efficient".

Evidence and Burden of Proof

Why is it important that the one who brings the charges, provides the evidence? Why is the concept of innocent until proven guilty so important?
It is because it is too difficult to prove a negative. But this is precisely what illegal authorities do routinely in family courts.


Most reasonable people would agree that there must be some reason for a person to be charged with a crime. There must be some evidence or basis for the accusation. So the one who makes the accusation is at an advantage, they have some reasonable evidence in hand. This evidence is the thing that prompted the investigation that focused on you as the main suspect. Mrs Peabody's Pilfered Pie

The Case of the Disappearing Pie.

Suppose the crime was stealing a blueberry pie that had been cooling in the kitchen window of Mrs. Peabody. This pie was decorated for a fourth of July celebration with a little plastic flag. The prosecution was first alerted to the fact because the owner of the pie reported it stolen. In the best case, the owner and another witness would have seen you do the dirty deed. Maybe an investigation would show footsteps and tiny pink feathers in the mud leading from the window to your house. Finally, when they walked into your house they would find you with a mouth full of blue stains and pie crust, mud on your feet, pink fuzzy slippers and a little flag in your hand.

Beyond a reasonable doubt they could prove that you walked by the neighbor's window and probably stole the pie. However, you could have baked a similar pie and might not be guilty of the theft. But you could be guilty of trespassing.

But suppose the burden of proof was yours. It becomes impossible to prove your innocence in many situations. This is exactly what these underground inquisition courts demand.

If the police came to your house without any evidence and said "prove that you did not steal your neighbor's pie", you would be unable to do it. If the crime was limited to a certain date and time then maybe you can provide some credible alibi. You were 200 miles away with the mayor dedicating a new orphanage on July 4, 2003 at 3:00 PM when the pie was stolen. And we have news media video tape to prove it.
And we do not yet have the technology to disassemble a person's molecules, beam them across the hemisphere and reassemble them at the same coordinates of the neighbor's pie in one second.

If you happened to live alone, and had no alibi then you would be convicted.

If you could produce your stomach contents and prove that a pie was not included, then you might have only succeeded in proving that you did not eat the pie. You did not prove that you did not steal the pie.

Burden of Proof. So the concept of burden of proof is not only reasonable it is logical. The person making the charge should be able to prove it. There must be some reason why he selected you as the culprit. It protects people from malicious prosecution. If this were not the standard then your enemies would be able to make any accusation against you and prevail. This is precisely what is allowed in secret, underground "family courts."

Here are some things that are impossible to prove:

You did not read last month's issue of Playboy.
You never stole from the church offering.
You are thinking about an assassination plan.
You are not thinking about an assassination plan.

The Infallible Supernatural Confirmation.

I have a stupid granduncle who had a dream that his wife was being unfaithful. That week he met a man in a bar who looked exactly like the man in his dream. He came home and immediately accused his wife of having an affair. Years later, in any arguments they had he would continue to make this absurd accusation. This is the same logic found in some small children or in the hysterical. Many adults are easily made hysterical by the enflaming of fears or duress by abusive, manipulative authorities.

The Salem witch hunts were based on the same logic, that the supernatural is its own unimpeachable witness. This "spectral evidence" becomes acceptable in our courts.

Double Jeopardy

The concept of double jeopardy guarantees you the security that you will not be charged over and over again for the same crime until the prosecution can get the "right" jury or court to prove that you are guilty.

This is important for several reasons:

A malicious government or legal system or person with unlimited funds could use this process to ruin someone financially. Even if the state were forced to pay legal costs if you were acquitted, there remains a problem of maintaining your job, home and skills while you spend endless days in jail or in court.
It forces the prosecution to prepare a good case. They cannot do a shoddy job knowing that they will get unlimited chances to convict you. The system already gives them time to prepare the case.

Double Jeopardy - Unattached?

Clever law makers are getting around the spirit of this law by allowing the following types of court cases to occur despite the verdict in criminal court. This usually happens in very public, emotional cases.

Civil Law Suits.

Even after conviction in a criminal court fails, a court with lower standards can convict someone and financially ruin them. They now routinely take their children. This should not be, but is not a source of outrage by the common citizen. People become conditioned to the fact that public outrage has no effect on "the system." Democracy?

Another Jurisdiction.

Another court system or another country can charge you with an equivalent crime.

Another Law.

Failure to convict in one court might lead to charges in another court that are technically different crimes. A person can be acquitted of murder in one court, only to be charged with "depriving a person of their civil rights" in federal court. This civil right is the right to life.


The French Fashion Police

The French have found a new weapon in the war against terrorism. It is the scarf and the beanie!

It was with tongue in cheek that I created this ridiculous example to illustrate the concept of extradition. But on December 19, the French proved that anything ridiculous will be possible. As this web page warns, ridiculous religious laws will be made with terrorism and unity as the justification.

Declaring themselves a secular society, although they are 88% Catholic, the French have banned the Muslim head scarf and the Jewish beanie in public places. "Small" Christian crosses are allowed. Jews can wear a small star of David instead. Most of my Jewish friends want to wear a beanie. They do not wear the star of David.

The Religious Fashion Police in History

637 Muslims captured Caesarea and forced Jews to wear a yellow patch
807 Caliph Harun Al Rashid forced Jews of Baghdad to wear a yellow badge and Christians a blue badge
1008 Egyptian caliph Hakkim forced all Jews to wear a gold calf around their necks
1215 Fourth Lateran Council forced Jews to wear the yellow patch as a "badge of shame"
1268 Austria forces Jews to wear a badge.
1267 Vienna city council forced Jews to wear the Pileum Coronutum, a cone shaped hat
1275 King Edward of England forced Jews over seven to wear a badge
1321 Henry II forced Jews to wear yellow badges
1555 Pope Paul IV forced Jews to wear a special yellow cap in the bull "Cum Nimis Absurdum"
1939 Hitler forces Jews to wear the star of David
199? Taliban forced non-Muslims to wear a badge
2003 France prohibits religious symbols, except a cross
2005 Germany prohibits religious symbols, except a cross
Old data Source: Jewish Virtual Library.

Agreements made to transport the accused from one jurisdiction to another. This includes from one country to another. Under the concept of "Dual Criminality", one assumption is that the laws under which the accused is charged is a criminal offence in both countries. It guarantees that a foreign state cannot ask for the extradition of a citizen for actions that are not criminal within his own country. It even ensures that the foreign state cannot prosecute a citizen for an action that was committed in his own country but which is illegal in the foreign country.

Maybe the Constitution's attempt to keep freedom simple by keeping politics out of government wasn't such a bad idea after all.

Conditioning entire societies to be offended by the truth is the whole point of Republican politics. Republican Sex Cults are very real and will destroy your children's future. Please donate what you can so we can raise this issue to the national standing that it deserves. This donation will go toward building awareness of this serious fraud against our children!

Sunday, January 13, 2008

Basic Parental Rights Routinely Violated by Child Protection Services and Republican Sex Cults

Do you live under the fond illusion that you have basic parental rights? This is a profoundly important question in the Post-Orwellian age, as the federal government's regard for "low intensity conflict" now fully applies to American parents. 25 million U.S. parents have discovered that they do not have any basic parental rights in today's courts of equity or "family courts," and they find this out when it is too late. The programmed attitude that parents have no rights and are sex predators is directly linked to the elite Nazis at the CIA. The CIA has programmed the bureuacrats which target your children with Nazi sex magic tricks and this Nazi Mind Control serves eugenics.

"Low intensity" means that your pleas for justice will go largely unheard. "Low intensity" means that civil rights can be effectively destroyed over the long term because this erosion of basic rights will never be raised to the public consciousness because the government's secret eugenics operation is protected by a controlled media. Basic parental rights will then disappear and totally obvious eugenics operations will become normalized. This allows for active political and cultural eugenics operations to destroy millions of American families and fully Nazify the American people by programmed marionette bureaucrats advancing basic witchcraft sex taboos against good parents. These programmed and deluded bureaucrats will even believe that they are doing good.

By effectively employing Freudian sex taboos against the individual, the driving force of sexual hysteria and sexual abuse are never blamed on its true source, a highly secretive federal government, and the entire world will be made blind to these horrific crimes of eugenics.

"Homeland Security," a totally Nazi concept, now allows a secret federal government full manipulation of "science," the same "science" that will pervert millions of Americans into mind-controlled cyborgs.

Big brother wants to instruct you on how to raise your children. He has an agenda for your family and a personal "gut" feeling about you. He has actively manipulated the entire "science" of human behavior to suit his slave-making needs. He may place a wire around your penis and show you child pornography. He may require a polygraph to determine your eligibility for fatherhood. He may depict normal human sexuality, affection or even fine art as deeply criminal. He will never tell you that all of these methods of political abuse have been deemed illegal by the Supreme Court. He would never do this to the political elite. After all, they are "moral" and "decent" people (who happen to know their rights). He will do this to those deemed politically unacceptable and those conditioned by wrongful authority not to know that sexual repression and political social engineering actually rules them.

By accepting the political scams of the elite, you will be brought into a bizarre scheme of demoralization, eugenics false courts and dehumanization which is never applied to the elite. This Kafkaesque realm of constitutional abuse is fully accepted by lawyers and other elite conformists, therefore, you will not get clear answers to your basic constitutional questions from them. Your basic parental rights to protect your own children from the most basic sexual scams of the elite do not exist because you are not the elite. What's worse, those surrounding you are themselves fully brainwashed by the elite "science" of eugenics which programs them to do service for the elite. They will destroy countless "non-elite" families simply because these children might receive "elite" education and they will do so with the complete zeal of the crusader. Only a parent can see through these idiot scams and protect his child.

As difficult as it is for many Americans to accept, the historical facts are overwhelming. Actual Nazis have manipulated the psychological community through the 1947 National Security Act and the CIA "truth" funding in order to operate and normalize active eugenics operations in the U.S.. These operations actively criminalize comprehensive sex education and other empowering methods used by the elite with their own children. This is why Americans have become so idiotic concerning basic sexuality, child empowerment, drug abuse and sexually transmitted diseases. Now fully programmed marionette bureaucrats are programmed to wildly exaggerate child abuse in ways that actually create this child abuse by repressing the parental duty of sex education. Sexual repression imposed by the state actually creates child abuse, as such is fully consistent with human psychology, but you will never here this fact from your CIA, elitist-controlled mass media.

By keeping the mass non-elite population deliberately ignorant of the parental duty, the state then builds a more primitive mind in the repressed population, conditioning them like cattle for slaughter. The parental duty, like usury and other long-standing historically necessary facts of life has been deliberately repressed from the non-elite population by the elite. The parental duty being fully repressed, long established to protect and empower children throughout history, sets up the non-elite population for self-destruction and utter enslavement by the elite.

These "behaviorist" educated marionettes will use actual trauma-based brainwashing methods against children and mothers in order to destroy millions of U.S. families. But they will never be told that such trauma has been perfected in Nazi death camps to be used to make slaves. Mothers are now routinely placed into extreme hysteria by Mengele-perfected hysteria-building devices of fear or terror, effectively clearing their unconscious minds so that they can then be programmed to "accept" that their husbands or partners are horrible child abusers. Such a scam serves eugenics in case after case. This programming is fully encoded as "necessary" for "protection" of children before any facts about such alleged "abuse" are ever established. In fact, in most cases the fathers are actively demonized and ostracized before they can establish any form of understanding of these basic witch-hunt "charges." Tavistock has been given billions of dollars of U.S. tax-payer money in order to sex-up these Nazi sex inquisitions and make the vast majority of Americans view them as "normal" or "necessary" for CSI-styled child protection. Then horrific cases of child abuse are played continually in the military-programmed media in order to sustain the statistical results of family destruction. They will never tell the American public that the elite are trained to encourage sexual activity and sexual education in their own children for healthy "elite" or "king's" methods of child rearing and are fully protected from this eugenics fraud. Sexual repression through these methods represent the most basic eugenics scams of the elite.

Sexual repression then makes Americans so sexually stupid that they now easily fall for Child Services touch taboo tricks and other basic witchcraft devices of eugenics. It never occurs to programmed people to question these hysteria-building devices. After all, to do so would challenge the "peer pressure" mechanisms of conformity set up by Tavistock mass-media programming. Peer pressure is now used ubiquitously as a mob-rule device of mass conformity. Since parent's have many duties to their children in all areas including the genitalia, touch taboos are highly effective Freudian devices of building mass hysteria in the non-elite, uneducated populations easily manipulated by peer-pressure devices.

The "validators" of such "abuse" are never permitted around the children of the elite, including major figures within our federal government and are extensively trained in the witchcraft arts and not the sciences. Well educated professionals know that these sex taboos are highly subjective and are therefore easily manipulated by basic witchcraft devices of shame, hysteria and false drama. But most non-elite parents are unable to challenge such false drama. Professionals know that the child will follow the reaction of the adult and these marionettes are fully programmed to react in the worst possible manner in case after case. Programmed marionettes possess absolutely no common sense in child development matters, because they have themselves been programmed by these same witchcraft devices in order to distrust virtually every non-elite "sex offender." They are told, quite literally, that such offenders are everywhere. This hysteria is conditioned by many emotion-based Tavistock group-dynamics courses, seminars and multi-media presentations. This hysteria then over-rides all rational thought about normal and necessary sex education. This was the most basic Nazi trick used effectively against the Jews and other minorities. This is the main reason why the parental duty was forced underground in the first place. The elite have always feared and demonized the parental duty in the non-elite population. The psychological truths are these: those most likely to react harshly to pedophilia hysteria and punishment are closeted pedophiles themselves. They are reacting harshly and disproportionately because of their own inner demons. This has been proven over and over again in real courts of law. Most Nazis advancing harsh "anti-pedophile" laws in Nazi Germany were fully exposed as being pedophiles themselves. Those who repress the parental duty in non-elite populations most likely suffer from pedophilia demons and must be confronted as such.

The CIA has been actively involved in keeping these fundamental truths about basic human psychology and sexual hysteria fully out of the public domain in America. They have simultaneously advanced these same truths in post-war Germany in order to build a less militant population. In Germany, the Tavistock and CIA-backed Kinderladen movement and comprehensive sex education movement has been widely viewed as highly successful. This is largely because this movement is based upon real science and natural child rearing enjoyed by elite children. This information is fully repressed from the U.S. population, as this population is directed by our own secret government to be a militant, sexually-repressed Nazi population fully available for Pentagon mind programming. Why Americans routinely react in horror to such child empowerment is no coincidence. They have been programmed to be "peasants" and a highly militant population, quite deliberately. They will never question the "naturalness" of children being held in total sexual ignorance well into their teens. This makes perfect sense as one studies the Mind Control programming used to create military killers, mass-media believers and other conformists. Such programming requires a disproportionately large population of sexually repressed children. These are children who have "learned" that imposed ignorance is a "necessary" part of life. Much of this repression is done through basic elitist scams which demonize good parents.

One such expert in child development, Richard A Gardner M.D. of Columbia University, bravely fought against the 9/11 fraud and the Nazification of American children. His many works in this field exposed the eugenics operations in America as a fundamental fraud to normal childhood development and the American family itself. He died of a brutal stabbing to the heart in 2003 which was blamed on a "suicide." He was not the first or most likely the last expert in child development to be so brutalized. This area of child development is most central to the Nazification of America, because it is where Nazis begin to build the normalization process of slavery into the next generation.

The massive underground funding for eugenics tricks against children and parents are highly historical coming from Rockefeller grants, secret elitist government and other pro-Nazi eugenics movements. This social engineering must first lull the vast majority of Americans into accepting the utter reversal of their Constitution. By demonizing non-elite parents in absolutely normal and necessary sex education or other responsibilities of good parents, these eugenicists achieve broad population control without any scientific proof or even legal proof of "abuse." They know that by building sexual hysteria throughout media through Alpha programming, this will bring government into your bedroom, into your children's lives. This is where government then destroys them, over and over again in the name of "decency." Such a Nazi scam requires intense Psy-Ops missions and a "Sun King" media and government all dressed up as constitutional patriots. Tavistock has been employed to do this to Americans through Mind Control.

Big Brother will keep your children sexually repressed in a cold, sterile environment of imposed ignorance, banality, fear, confusion and double-speak. In such a realm, human demoralization will serve his slave-making needs. What applies to the children of the powerful will never apply to your children. He will certainly use the full powers of the state to keep you from your child, while bureaucrats manipulate your child with proven "sex magic" methods used by actual sex cults. All of these methods were developed for and by the military, but you will never be told of their real origins. Now they are routinely used against non-elite children everywhere, ubiquitously. And if you forget that they have a "right" to do this to your children, they may bury your family's case in a blizzard of obscure paperwork designed only to confuse and intimidate you. After all, these are not real courts recognized as such by our own Supreme Court. These are the eugenicist's courts of totalitarian deception. This imposed government dysfunction through abstract bureaucracy actually works for the political elite. They are fully protected from these devices of psychological warfare against the non-elite.

By normalizing bureaucrats over parents, the New World Order can circumvent our Constitution, making all atrocities possible.

You may then lose your child to pure bureaucratic arrogance, greed and dysfunction, especially if you stand up to your constitutional rights. Such rights are mere window dressing on the house of the dead. This is routinely done to children too young to understand that they are being manipulated. This is all done in secret, outside of public view. Is this wrong? Americans today do not seem to have the mental capacity to even answer that question. Why?

Parents have a constitutional right to direct and control the upbringing of their children, and laws or governmental actions that unreasonably infringe the rights of parents to raise and educate their children according to their own values are constitutionally suspect. Many of these actions are now designed to bring federal dollars into local government control and feed the Beast with self-serving lies, deception and witchcraft tricks. The Supreme Court has directly acknowledged a parent's rights to direct the upbringing, education and care of his or her children. But today, broad conspiracies against these rights by state and local officials are grounds for severe civil penalties, RICO or other fraud charges and both federal and International felony charges. The march toward absolute slavery is profoundly normalized until we act.

These bureaucrats have absolutely no evidence against you except that which can be inspired through basic witchcraft sexual taboos and may apply to any parent applying proper parental oversight of children, but they will inspire widespread hysteria against you, nonetheless. They cannot apply these horrendous methods against the elite. If they do have evidence, it's usually of the Salem-Witch-Trial variety where taboo, superstition or pure bigotry is raised to the level of "a deeply troubling crime," a purely subjective form of absolute child abuse against the children involved. Rarely do these "crimes" find convictions in real courts requiring due process with good lawyers and real human beings and parents as jurors. This is obvious eugenics which the elite have advanced secretly for decades. Hitler's folly is fully institutionalized and made invisible. For every parent convicted of a real "sex" crime, about ten U.S. families are destroyed. Yet, you will only hear of the horrible sex abuse cases through media Psy-Ops. This is how "statistical results" for the elite and the Pentagon are actually achieved. Do non-elite parents actually have a right to privacy against these obvious eugenics programs?

View Judge John Roberts confirmation of a right to privacy

These political agents now have very sophisticated psychological tools which turn nearly any common parental practice into a "sexual" event. This assault on the parental duty to empower children is perhaps the most dangerous mission of our secret elitist government. These same amplification devices can be used to make children fear their own shadows, but because sexual innuendo is used against the parent, no one questions these sexual amplification methods. They have been conditioned as children not to question them. Is this even remotely fair? You are not even allowed to know about these methods or the statistics on the families they destroy. But is imposed ignorance such a good thing for these children? After all, human sexuality is perfectly normal, innate and unavoidable. But this bureaucratic hysteria is accepted by everyone, even though it would be considered malicious and illegal slander in most advanced countries. We are no longer such a country.

Most advanced countries understand the dangers of sexual repression enforced by a secret government. Sexually repressed children grow up to become sexually repressed parents for which the government can easily inflict hysteria and other conditioning agents of control. After a few generations, families simply dissolve because no meaningful bonds are possible and government then takes over.

Illegal social engineering programs are very active and are all around you. They are run by programmed drones who literally have the opposite moral instincts as our Founding Fathers who created our Constitution and government. This is a mind-control worm straight out of Nazi Germany! See Monarch Mind Control Programming.

You would never know that a long-standing precedent of the United States Supreme Court holds that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental liberty interest of parents in the care, custody and control of their children. Because government bureaucrats routinely get things wrong, especially with children. Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 401 (1923); Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 535 (1925).

If you attempt to educate your children and empower them with basic sexual knowledge, you will be branded by an illegal scarlet letter of shame telling the world that you "corrupted" your own children. So you must educate your children in absolute secrecy. After all, this has been done for centuries under tyrants and is the single best indicator of which children will succeed in society and which will fail. Those children suspended in ignorance, as the oppressor wants, will adopt ignorance and will fail. They will "learn" to conform to any idiot demand by authority figures, even if these will ultimately destroy their lives. If your children are left to blunder in ignorance in a dangerous world, they are at extreme risk, not only by sexual predators, but by their own government, by their own church. But who placed them at this risk? Did parents do this? Who is actually making children sexually repressed and ignorant and therefore making some of them sex predators through pure attitude propaganda and imposed ignorance? Remember, our government was set up to serve us, not the other way around. Today bureaucrats routinely inspire fear and lies to destroy families. They claim such actions are mandated by law. This process creates sex predators. These facts are overwhelming because they are universally understood by the very children who are made false orphans, suspended in ignorance and denied critical bonding with a parent. These children will never grow up to praise their traffickers. Some will grow up to be much worse.

You would never know that these agents of family destruction are the truest definition of criminals in your community. They work for your local government! But when they get it wrong, they do not pay. They masquerade as "saving" children from "predators" (usually, their own parents). A complacent, distracted and conditioned populace accepts these smear stories as truth. Smear stories become more powerful than truth. All of these things are happening every day and are routine. Divorce rates skyrocket. Drug and alcohol abuse rise dramatically. Married people become a minority under "family values" Republicans. Children never learn of the bonds between father and child, but only if you remain ignorant, fearful and complacent and allow them to indoctrinate your children into state-sponsored, learned ignorance.

To understand how such broad and illegal social control has occurred through "child protection" programs, you must understand the nature of bureaucratic evil. The true power system used against these families is an ancient elite vs. non-elite power system where the elite have enjoyed absolute powers over the media, government and the Constitution itself. President Eisenhower left us many detailed documents on his concerns about the "vast military industrial complex" and its plans to creep silently and universally into our lives. These plans have been largely carried out through incremental programs which all begin as "altruistic" programs. A government "altruistic" program designed to save drowning orphans in a pond cannot be effectively questioned by "decent" people when this program is implemented. After all, who can deny the basic goodness of saving drowning children? But this same program 40 years later easily morphs into a round-up of perfectly healthy orphans who are then drown in the same pond. This is the nature of institutional evil for which President Eisenhower saw firsthand in Germany. Since the "program's" real intent was to objectify the children through political bureaucracy, such evil objectification evolves while the original intent of "saving" children has become completely corrupted by politics.

Over a period of almost two centuries, the Supreme Court of the United States has developed a presumption regrading parents' actions on behalf of their children. The Court first introduced a parental presumption in 1838 in the case of Jenkins v. Pye, when it announced that in the "absence of all proof tending to a contrary conclusion," it is the natural and reasonable presumption that parents intend to benefit the child as part of their discharge of a moral and parental duty. But today, this "moral, parental duty" is far more complicated and has been deliberately made so! Through HIV/AIDS awareness and sound psychology, we now know that the parental duty includes effective sex education at effective times in a child's development. But such education now comes in direct conflict with active social-engineering operations. This conflict, therefore, serves to expose a much broader manipulation of power designed to shift the very core of power itself: the unconscious understanding of power, highly relevant to our Supreme Court and our Constitution. This is a critical topic involving all of government.

We can trace the child sex abuse hysteria of the past two decades directly to the media-programmers who function at the top of the federal government, the CIA and FBI. Together they have programmed the programmers with sexual hysteria hype designed to fulfill Mind Control operations for eugenics, population control and political power. Now, each and every "enemy" of the powers-that-be are subject to broad sex-abuse investigations into their personal lives, simply because the "authorities" have hyped sex abuse. These abuses secure powers at the very top of government, not for years, but for decades. We now have a legitimate concern that such wrongful authority may never leave power. Childhood sexual hysteria directly affects the parent-child bond and serves to program children for Mind Control manipulation. This programming was highly specific to Nazi Germany and this no accident. Most of these programs directly evolved from American eugenics "tricks" employed to build sex abuse hysteria and traffic in children. This programs children for core gullibility where they then are easily manipulated by wrongful authority.

These cases are obvious Nazi tricks designed to separate children from their rightful parents. These "validators" are so Nazi-specific that there is literally no way to distinquish them from earlier Nazis.

In 1979, the Court revisited its parental presumption in the instrumental case of Parham v. J.R.; this time however, the Court determined that absent evidence for neglect and abuse, "the traditional presumption that the parents act in the best interests of their child should apply." The Court's latest proclamation of the presumption appeared in the plurality opinion of Troxel v. Granville in the year 2000, when Justice O'Connor, writing for the Court, insisted on employing the presumption that "fit parents act in the best interests of their children." But what if "abuse" is directly manipulated by nefarious political agents for purposes of secret social engineering? This matter will then need to be revisited by the Supreme Court, as it is fundamentally unconstitutional for such social engineering.

This blog follows the course of parent-child relationship transformation of the parental pressumption through a detailed analysis of wrongful authority as it has been applied to parent and child by covert government activity. It argues the parental presumption's meaning, role, weight, and scope have been altogther transformed, a transformation that reflects a historical change in the way the Court may conceive of the American family structure and relationships based on wrongful authority, the legal concept of parental authority over children, buraucrats over children and children's interests and rights.

It then provides a critical review of the parental presumptions' development and implications in light of the changes in American family history and jurisprudence, and concludes the parental presumption has developed in a manner inconsistent with the changing realities of the American family and irreconcilable with the evolution of the Supreme Court's concept of parental authority. Additionally, it reveals that the nature of the presumption's development reinforces a perception of childhood as a period of insignificance and irrelevance and excludes children and their unique experiences from legal discourse. This blind spot on child development is no passive evolution! There is a profound movement away from the parent-child bond for which must now be addressed.

This work therefore offers to replace the parental presumption with a vocabulary that is more accommodating to the American family structure and relationships and the Supreme Court's legal tradition, and better protects children's interests and rights to have meaningful and biological families.

This is precisely why the Supreme Court has consistently sided with parental bonding over bureaucrats, profiteers or mobs. But such violations between parent and child are now a matter of intense wrongful authority over the parent. Take a recent Texas case for example. In Eldorodo, Texas child welfare officials have removed nearly 400 women and children from a secretive West Texas religious "cult" built by "polygamist" leader Warren Jeffs. Why do I place such words as "polygamist," "pedophile" or "cults" in quotes? Because these are words routinely used to encode political language for sexual innuendo purposes. Since the Mormon Church is part of the Republican base, it is rarely referred to as a "cult." Sexual innuendo is a leading street device used for mind control in mass media and now, is routinely used in our own courts.

Applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, the Fourth Amendment provides: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated...." Because the Amendment focuses on safeguarding persons from unwarranted intrusion, and not on regulating the behavior of particular governmental actors, the prohibition against unreasonable seizures extends to civil, as well as criminal, investigations by the government.

In Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc., 336 F.3d 1194 (10th Cir. 2003), the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals held that there is no social worker exception to the Fourth Amendment. In Dubbs, eight pre-school children enrolled in the Head Start program were subjected to intrusive physical examinations, including genital examinations and blood tests, on school premises without parental notice or consent.

Also in 2003, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in Doe v. Heck, 327 F.3d 492 (7th Cir. 2003), held that the strictures of the Fourth Amendment apply to child welfare workers, as well as all other governmental employees. In that case, a private Christian elementary school and a student's parents sued several child welfare caseworkers under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments after the caseworkers interviewed a student about corporal punishment without a warrant or the consent of the school or parents.

A Fourth Amendment analysis is based on the totality of the circumstances in determining whether a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to terminate an encounter with government. Some of the factors considered include:

1) the threatening presence of several officials;
2) the brandishing of a weapon by an official;
3) some physical touching by an official;
4) use of aggressive language or tone of voice indicating that compliance with an official's request is compulsory;
5) prolonged retention of a person's personal effects;
6) a request to accompany the official to the station;
7) interaction in a nonpublic place or a small, enclosed place;
8) and absence of other members of the public.

The investigation began after a 16-year-old living there complained of physical abuse. But physical abuse does not incite the political and emotional responses as much as sexual abuse, so this investigation quickly turned on "sexual abuse" of underaged children and became a national story. For those truly educated about such cases, sex abuse charges are known to be highly suspect in any child custody case, but work as powerful innuendo devices against those ignorant of this common practice. A search warrant authorized state troopers to enter the retreat run by the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and look for evidence of a marriage between the girl and a 50-year-old man.

The warrant said the girl had a baby eight months ago, when she was 15. But due to the state abuses of child services, it is now very common for these young women to lie about their ages, as they are led to believe that underaged girls will be allowed to keep their children, while older women will lose their children through state child theft. State abuses serve to compound on themselves where this routine abuse of Constitutional rights now serves to build hysteria, a powerful conditioning device used to traffic children.

State Child Protective Services in April 2008 removed 52 girls from the compound. Marleigh Meisner, a spokeswoman for the agency, said that another 131 residents were removed overnight and that by Saturday afternoon 137 children and 46 women were being housed and interviewed.

"They seem to be doing fine," Meisner said. Four investigators remained inside the polygamist compound looking for additional children.

The whereabouts of the young mother who sparked the investigation are unknown, Meisner said.

State troopers who raided the religious retreat were looking for the girl, her baby girl and 50-year-old Dale Barlow. Under Texas law, girls younger than 16 cannot marry, even with parental approval.

Barlow had not been found by Friday night, officials said then. They declined to comment Saturday, saying a state judge had issued a gag order.

The search warrant instructed officers to look for marriage records or other evidence linking the girl to Barlow and the baby. The warrant authorized the seizure of computer drives, CDs, DVDs or photos.

Those inside the retreat did not respond to requests for comment.

The Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints broke away from the Mormon church after the latter disavowed polygamy more than a century ago. The Mormon church is a major Republican political base.

Most Americans have been conditioned to accept such police force against nearly 400 Americans as acceptable. But this draconian round-up in redneck America is anything but acceptable under our Constitution. This form of legal drift away from our Constitution is anything but uncommon. Today, parental rights do not exist, unless such a parent is a total political conformist. There is no difference between this round-up and the Nazi round-ups of the 1930s. Where the Nazis employed racial ignorance to condition their population, we are now allowing sexual ignorance and hyper-abuse hysteria to over-run basic liberties of any political, religious or ethnic minority. Mengele learned through horrific butchery of countless children in deathcamps that state-imposed hysteria is the only method of mind control necessary to break many or all family bonds. But, today, the "value" of the babies captured can be statistically proven to be an actual variable in these cases. In the Texas case, these babies are "valuable" in today's adoption circles.

This is a massive fraud against basic parental and civil rights where one woman's hysteria has been allowed to violate the lives and basic Constitutional rights of nearly 400 others. Such obvious fascist abuse of political power is only possible under complete mind control where a highly conditioned population is easily manipulated by sexual taboos, sexual innuendo and sexual ignorance. Since this cult believes and practices a politically unacceptable version of Mormonism, violating a major Republican base, they are swept up like raddlesnakes by "protection" services. Such manipulation was developed into a "science" in Nazi Germany and now is very effectively used in America against political minorities. What the government will not tell you, is that the real sex cults are the child services bureaucrats who are meticulously conditioned through marionette programming. They have perfected the cult of sexual repression to such a degree, that very few Americans even question it.

In Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944), the Court again confirmed that there is a constitutional dimension to the right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children. "It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents." 321 U.S. at 166. Subsequent cases applying this principle have explained that this constitutional liberty derives from the presumption that "natural bonds of affection lead parents to act in the best interests of their children." Parham v. J. R., 442 U.S. 584, 602 (1979).

But today's "Child Services" organizations are broadly abusing these basic rights. "Bonds of affection" are now routinely depicted as "sexual" through actual sex cults who employ sexual amplification techniques, shock and fear into vulnerable children to build hysteria where it is simply unwise and unethical to do so. Feminists bring a deep distrust or hatred for men, gays, blacks, liberals or any other personal bias to these children through "the system" and spread whisper campaigns against parents. They go to bat for a relative or friend in a custody dispute and get away with it. After all, they enjoy near absolute powers to defame anyone, especially parents who try to empower their children with a grounding in the truth. They work intimately with "sexual taboos" which a conditioned populace have been conditioned for nervous laughter or fear, even in politicians. Therefore, these sex cults are not effectively regulated by anyone. But does anyone deny learning basic and necessary facts of life through these taboos, as children, when they were not yet taboo?

If you learned important facts of life through sexual taboos, before they became taboos, you are perfectly normal. These bureuacrats want to take this normal process away from your children by repressing all such activity. Science does not even have a conditioned population to study on this since this would be considered "unethical" if applied to any population in a scientific study.

The use of adult taboos with children are routine scams and ploys which actually work to manipulate custody of children even when neither parent seeks such confrontation. Since children are very naturally confused by sexual issues they do not yet understand, these political agents can effectively amplify this confusion, focus it and call it a "complaint against" or "evidence of" "abuse." These conspirators are working through local "protection" agencies (CPS) which now routinely traffic in children using these methods. This scam is promoted throughout the U.S. targeting specific, "non-Republican" groups. Official CPS agencies are actual hate groups that use numerous conforming "professionals" to work illegal social engineering programs in complete secrecy. Republicans call it "welfare reform," but history has other words for it. Americans are conditioned to accept this obvious abuse of our Constitution as "necessary." They are never told the truth about these "clean" population control methods which target political minorities. And your tax dollars are paying for the rape-kitting of babies, the millions of false orphans such fraud produces and the massive trauma done to the political enemies of Republicans. All children everywhere are most vulnerable to these "sex magic" methods between the ages of 5 and 12. This is when CPS agents can most easily manipulate them. Funding for this political activity is determined according to political maps and are implemented by political agents who may be too stupid to know that they work a fraudulent and elitist agenda.

You may be reported to authorities for kissing your child at the school house. But Republicans will ultimately pay a high price when this fraud is fully exposed. Many of these cults serve a political function enforcing Republican ideals of human development and sexuality, even employing touch taboos with small children against their own parents. But these ideals serve a Kingdom and not a Democracy. They enforce and maintain a fundamentally biased and fraudulent political mission. See Republican Sex Cults Investigation, Bedford, Pennsylvania.

Some studies suggest that children incorporate aspects of the interviewer’s questions into their answers in an attempt to tell the interviewer what the child believes is being sought. This contention has been disputed, however. Studies also show that when adults ask children questions that do not make sense (such as “Is milk bigger than water?” or “Is red heavier than yellow?”), most children will offer an answer, believing that there is an answer to be given (rather than understand the absurdity of the question). Furthermore, repeated questioning of children causes them to change their answers. This is because the children perceive the repeated questioning as a sign that they did not give the “correct” answer previously. Children are also especially susceptible to leading and suggestive questions.

Our federal government, through top-secret MKULTRA programs which then morphed into other "brain" programs has spent billions of dollars perfecting the "art" of increasing "suggestibility." This technology has dramatically reshaped our entire psychological health community, largely perfecting Mind Control on a massive scale.

Interviewer bias also plays a role in shaping child testimony. When an interviewer has a preconceived notion as to the truth of the matter being investigated, the questioning is conducted in a manner to extract statements that support these beliefs. As a result, evidence that could disprove the belief is never sought by the interviewer. Additionally, positive reinforcement by the interviewer can taint child testimony. Often such reinforcement is given to encourage a spirit of cooperation by the child, but the impartial tone can quickly disappear as the interviewer nods, smiles, or offers verbal encouragement to “helpful” statements. Some studies show that when interviewers make reassuring statements to child witnesses, the children are more likely to fabricate stories of past events that never occurred.

Peer pressure also influences children to fabricate stories. Studies show that when a child witness is told that his or her friends have already testified that certain events occurred, the child witness was more likely to create a matching story. The status of the interviewer can also influence a child’s testimony – the more authority an interviewer has (such as a police officer), the more likely a child is to comply with that person’s agenda.

Finally, while there are supporters of the use of anatomically correct dolls in questioning victims of sexual abuse/molestation, there are also critics of this practice. Critics argue that because of the novelty of the dolls, children will act out sexually explicit acts with the dolls even if the child has not been sexually abused. Another criticism is that because the studies that compare the differences between how abused and non-abused children play with these dolls are conflicting (some studies suggest that sexually abused children play with anatomically correct dolls in a more sexually explicit manner than non-abused children, while other studies suggest that there is no correlation), it is impossible to interpret what is meant by how a child plays with these dolls.

Good science has known since Mengele that state agents employing child interviewing methods get horribly inaccurate and biased results. Given all of these obvious problems with child interviewing in our "adversarial system," why would any "public servant" do such a thing to any family, simply because that family does not enjoy the protections of our elite families? The only possible answer to this question goes to the very heart of human and institutional evil.

In 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court reiterated the importance of this interest in the case of Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000), ruling that a Washington State statute allowing “any person” to petition for visitation was unconstitutional because it impermissibly infringed on the rights of parents. But the arrogance of many child workers today is extreme and active family destruction now takes on broad conspiracies against rights. Make no mistake about it, these are federal felonies being routinely violated by Femi-Nazi child trafficking organizations working for the state.

In the seminal case of Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972), the Supreme Court upheld the principle that an unwed father could not be presumed to be an unfit parent, but was entitled to a hearing pursuant to the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This case thus marks the connection between the substantive rights of parents and the procedural requirements necessary to protect those rights. Many fathers today are actively "criminalized" in false and underground courts in an effort to manipulate custody of their children. These slanders are fraudulent and are felonies against basic parental rights.

Not only are parents entitled to an evidentiary hearing before a determination can be made as to their "fitness" (i.e., whether their parental rights should be terminated permanently), but the Due Process Clause also dictates that the standard of proof in such cases must be clear and convincing evidence, rather than a mere preponderance. Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982). We are seeing more and more family courts violate this most basic of parental rights.

The New Mexico Supreme Court reviewed and endorsed these doctrines in the case of In the Matter of the Adoption of J.J.B., 119 N.M. 638 (1995), which clarified the standards for termination of parental rights on the grounds of presumptive abandonment. See §22.4 of this Handbook. That case, however, like the precedents to which it adheres, reiterates that the rights of parents are not absolute. Rather, those rights must be balanced against the interests of the child, and the state's compelling interest as parens patriae. See also, Santosky v. Kramer, cited above. But where states falsely impose these rights, the law must apply against the state officials. Even RICO law violations can be brought against those agents who traffic in children through deception or force.

Similarly, in Williams v. Williams, 2002-NMCA-074, 132 N.M. 445, the Court of Appeals distinguished Troxel v. Granville, in upholding a district court order granting visitation rights to grandparents over the parents’ objection. “Troxel may have altered, but it did not eradicate, the kind of balancing process that normally occurs in visitation decisions,” considering both the child’s best interests and the parents’ wishes. ¶23, 132 N.M. at 451.

Although the courts have not explicitly articulated the contours of the corresponding rights of children, the truth is self-evident that children also have certain inalienable needs: to be free from physical and emotional harm at the hands of their caretakers; and to be provided with the essentials of food, shelter, education and medical care.

The legislature has defined in detail the duty and the discretion of parents, guardians and custodians. Under §32A-1-4, a parent has all of the duties and authority of guardianship and legal custody of the child, unless limited by court order. The duties and authority of guardians and custodians are also described. These establish the constitutional foundation and justification for all child welfare proceedings.

In the short term, the state can act upon a showing of actual harm or imminent risk to the child, acquiring a greater degree of control in proportion to the proof of parental incapacity. During the pendency of any legal proceeding, the parent retains a statutory right to visitation with the child, unless the court finds that the best interests of the child preclude any visitation. §32A-4-22(D). Likewise, the child has a corresponding interest in maintaining contact with parents, siblings, extended family members and others with whom the child has a significant, caring relationship, unless such contact is shown to be contrary to the child's best interest. §32A-4-22(E).

Where the state can prove that the parent is unable to care for the child, it may move to terminate, rather than merely suspend, all parental authority. See Chapter 22. Moreover, if the state does intervene to deprive the parent of all rights regarding the child, then the state must also assume another function implicit in parenting, namely to provide a permanent and stable set of relationships, a sense of family identity for the child.

The definition of "parent" in the New Mexico Children's Code identifies as a parent a biological or adoptive parent "if the biological or adoptive parent has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in the care and custody of the child." §32A-1-4(O). This definition reflects the holdings of a line of cases from the United States Supreme Court that declare that the right to parent is not a mere incident of biology, but requires some sort of familial relationship.

In Caban v. Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380 (1979), the Court struck down a state law that treated unwed fathers differently than unwed mothers when the spouse of one of the parents petitioned to adopt the child. Referring to the case of Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246 (1978), the Court stressed that the strength of an unwed father's claim to his child is directly proportional to his efforts to fulfill his parental responsibility. 441 U.S. at 389, 393.

Conversely, in the case of Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248 (1983), the Court upheld New York's putative father registry, ruling that an unwed father has no guarantee of notice of the adoption of his child, unless he undertakes some affirmative actions to establish a custodial, personal, or financial relationship with her. A biological connection creates the opportunity to become a parent; but if a parent does not avail himself of that opportunity, the Constitution will not afford him that right automatically.

Even a father who has both a biological and an established relationship with his child may be denied parental rights by a state statutory presumption that the husband of the mother is the child's legal parent. Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989).

The question about who has a constitutionally protected liberty interest is answered to some extent in the Adoption Act, which defines the terms "acknowledged father," "presumed father," and "alleged father" and requires that the first two men, but not the last one, consent before an adoption can take place. See Appendix B for the definitions. These provisions make it clear that biology alone does not confer a constitutionally protected parental status. A father must act affirmatively to acknowledge his paternity in some fashion before it will be recognized by the courts or protected under the Children's Code.

Persons who have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in their children cannot be deprived of their rights without due process of law. At a minimum, due process requires notice and the opportunity to be heard. While the Children's Code and the Children's Court Rules establish the mechanism to meet these requirements, it is incumbent upon all the parties to verify that they are met in fact. In the first instance, this may mean something as mundane as establishing the correctness of addresses and telephone numbers; or it may entail a sophisticated search to identify and locate absent parents. Where no effort is made to contact the parent, it can be assumed that no due process has occurred. Throughout the proceedings, participants should endeavor to remember and respect the dignity and humanity of all the family members.

To protect these rights in particular, both the Code and the Rules provide for the appointment of counsel to represent respondents, and for those counsel to be provided free of charge if respondents are indigent. Case law has clarified that the right to counsel includes the right to effective assistance of counsel. State ex rel. CYFD v. Tammy S., 1999-NMCA-009, 126 N.M. 664 (decided in 1998). It also affirms the parent-respondent's right to an appeal. State ex rel. CYFD v. Alicia P., 1999-NMCA-098, 127 N.M. 664 (decided in 1998).

Recently a series of appellate decisions have delineated the dimensions of the opportunity to be heard when respondent is not physically present at trial, whether as a result of incapacity, incarceration or deportation. In such situations, alternative measures must be implemented to preserve the opportunity to testify on one's own behalf, to cross-examine witnesses, and to confer with counsel. State ex rel. CYFD in the Matter of Ruth Anne E., 1999-NMCA-035, 126 N.M. 670; State ex rel. CYFD v. Stella P., 1999-NMCA-100, 127 N.M. 699; State ex rel. CYFD v. Rosa R., 1999-NMCA-141, 128 N.M. 304.

Just as the due process rights of parents are protected, along with their substantive interests, by the presence of counsel, so the rights of children to fair treatment and decent outcomes are protected by their court-appointed guardian ad litem, or GAL. Recent case law has also clarified the importance of this role, and its scope in investigating and informing the court, as well as representing to the court the stated position of the child. State ex rel. CYFD in the Mattter of Esperanza M., 1998-NMCA-039, 124 N.M. 735 and State ex rel. CYFD in the Matter of George F., 1998-NMCA-119, 125 N.M. 597. See Chapter 6 on GALs.

Because of the significance of the interests involved, both the Code and Rules set forth requirements for advisement of parental rights.

Parents are to be advised of the rights they have during an investigation at the commencement of the investigation. These rights include the freedom from being compelled to appear or to produce any papers. §32A-4-4(B). They do not include the freedom to control access to the child, to obstruct or interfere with the investigation. §30-6-4. A child may be interviewed at school or elsewhere without the permission of the parent. §32A-4-5(C). If no petition is filed, a parent has the right to the results of the investigation, and may inspect foundational reports in the possession of CYFD, and may petition the court for further disclosure of records and information, provided that identification of individuals may be withheld. §32A-4-33(C).

The new International Criminal Court will come into existence in The Hague once 60 countries have ratified the ICC treaty. This is profoundly significant to all peoples who dwell on this planet, and especially to Americans, since the ICC claims universal jurisdiction to try individuals charged with genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression, anywhere on earth — even if the supposed defendants are citizens of a nation that has refused to ratify the treaty and the alleged crime has taken place inside the boundaries of that nation. This World Court will target children's issues such as child trafficking within the United States.

Of course, the issue of the Court’s credibility absent U.S. participation, and the practical matter of enforcing ICC judgments against an unwilling U.S. (or against just about anyone else, for that matter, without U.S. support), has not been lost on all. "You cannot have a court of universal jurisdiction without the world’s major military power on board," Netherlands delegate Gam Strijards was quoted as saying by the New York Times. "I won’t say we gave birth to a monster, but the baby has some defects." The myopic Dutchman may see a defective baby, but any sober, rational evaluation of the ICC will confirm that the creature born in Rome is indeed a monster. But building world awareness to the state of child trafficking in the U.S. will be a great reward.

Conditioning entire societies to be offended by the truth is the whole point of Republican politics. Republican Sex Cults are very real and will destroy your children's future. Please donate what you can so we can raise this issue to the national standing that it deserves. This donation will go toward building awareness of this serious fraud against our children!